- 80 -
of how active differing parishes are, but that they would also be affected by factors other than resourcefulness - in particular the presence or absence of a leader. There may also be cyclical phases which were felt to be difficult to isolate. The fifth similarly gives some measure of distinction between parishes, but after discussion, it was decided that the actual incidence of church day schools had too high an element of historical chance to make it appropriate. 4.2.2.23 Number of covenanted givers √ √ √ √
Probably the best measure available of the size of the committed core of parishioners, but still falling short of being ideal - in particular it fails to allow for patterns of amount given (see Figure 3) and for some parishes espousing, and some eschewing, covenants as a source of revenue. But should diocesan policy come to be more firmly in favour of parishes adopting covenanted giving, then it could possibly be brought into the formula to reduce rather than increase a parish's share, thereby encouraging parishes to follow the diocesan line. 4.2.2.24 Subscribers to parish magazine √ √ X X
Another factor which generated discussion - whilst parish magazines were accepted as indicating "drive and vitality" in a parish, their circulation would normally include at least some issued free (in some parishes all might be issued free as a means of stimulating interest) and would often include some sold to members of other denominations. Whilst the figure for gross circulation could easily be obtained, its composition would probably not be so easy, it was therefore deemed to fail the appropriateness test. |
||