- 74 -
This group is basically the actual income which had been used
prior to the inception of potential income, and its reconsideration
generated considerable debate. The advantages are the ease of
availability (all parishes record figures for attendances and giving
in a weekly service book), the disadvantages are deciding what is
'regular' and what 'fortuitous' income. Whilst there was general
agreement that the former was appropriate and that the latter was not,
consensus could not be reached as to where lay the border between the
two. Judging from the tenor of the discussion consensus will be
difficult to achieve until a closer study is made of the weekly
giving/special events giving theme. There was however agreement that
only the preceding year, and not the preceding several years, should
be the basis, there being no perceived need to iron out cyclical
fluctuations; and that none needed further analysis on to a per
capita basis.
4.2.1.3
Average (over the previous financial year) of the weekly:
(a) total expenditure √ √ X X
(b) net expenditure (after deducting
certain approved payments) √ √ ? ?
4.2.1.4
Average (over the previous several years) of the weekly:
(a) total expenditure √ √ X X
(b) net expenditure (after deducting
certain approved payments) √ √ X X
The use of expenditure was considered because it seemed a way
round the problem of weekly giving versus special events giving. Whilst
parishes might differ in their choice of methods of raising revenue,
they would be more of a mind in how they spend it since all would be
facing basically the same needs. The theory seemed promising, and
